In 'Substitution for the Testimony of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed', the United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia presents a detailed legal analysis of the use of substitution for testimonies in court proceedings, focusing specifically on the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. The book delves into the complex legal implications of such substitutions, exploring the ethical and practical considerations that arise in these circumstances. Written in a precise and authoritative style, the book offers a critical examination of the legal framework surrounding testimonial substitutions, rooted in the context of contemporary legal debates and precedents. Scholars of law and practitioners alike will find this book to be an invaluable resource for understanding the nuances of testimonial substitutions in the court of law.